Beasley v. Dowdell
91 So. 921
| Ala. | 1922

A re-examination of the former opinion, reported in 205 Ala. 130,87 So. 18, has satisfied the court of the correctness of the conclusion then reached, and, there being no substantial difference in the evidence, this appeal is affirmed on authority of the former appeal.

ANDERSON, C. J., SOMERVILLE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

McCLELLAN, J., dissents.

THOMAS, J., not sitting.