History
  • No items yet
midpage
Beach v. Sweeney
167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 477
Ohio
1958
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

There being no bill of exceptions filed or allowed by the Court of Appeals in which the case was heard de novo, this court cannot say that there was no substantial evidence warranting the Court of Appeals in reaching the conclusion it did. On appeal on questions of law all reasonable presumptions consistent with the record will be indulged in favor of the validity of the judgment under review and of the regularity and legality of the proceedings below.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Taet, Matthias and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Beach v. Sweeney
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 23, 1958
Citation: 167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 477
Docket Number: No. 35193
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.