History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bayouth v. State
40 Okla. Crim. 160
Okla. Crim. App.
1928
Check Treatment

On a petition for rehearing it is earnestly urged that the punishment assessed is excessive and that justice requires that the judgment should be modified. We have again examined the record and are of the opinion that this contention is well founded.

The judgment (39 Okla. Crim. 8, 262 P. 702) is therefore *Page 161 modified to the extent of striking out the imprisonment assessed. The petition for rehearing is overruled. Mandate forthwith.

DOYLE, P.J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Bayouth v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Date Published: May 26, 1928
Citation: 40 Okla. Crim. 160
Docket Number: No. A-5927.
Court Abbreviation: Okla. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.