History
  • No items yet
midpage
Baxter v. Orinoco Co.
160 Minn. 535
Minn.
1925
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein was dismissed, upon the ground that appellant failed to comply with chapter 22, Laws 1917, requiring a deposit of $15 with the clerk.

This is a motion asking that the appeal be reinstated. We see no reason for so doing. It appears that appellant’s counsel requested appellant to attend to such matter in sufficient time. Appellant failed to comply with the request until it was too late. Appellant is alone at' fault in the matter. The motion is denied.

Reported in 202 N. W. 829.

Case Details

Case Name: Baxter v. Orinoco Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Mar 15, 1925
Citation: 160 Minn. 535
Docket Number: No. 23,935
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.