Baxter v. Early
127 S.E. 607
S.C.
1925
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

April 24, 1925. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The decree of Judge Featherstone is satisfactory to this Court, and is affirmed for the reasons therein stated.

MR. JUSTICE WATTS concurs.

MR. JUSTICE MARION concurs in result.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY did not participate.





Dissenting Opinion

In my opinion Maude Baxter took under the will only a life estate with remainder as declared in the fifth paragraph. See authorities cited by me in Strother v. Folk, 123 S.C. 127;115 S.E., 605.