History
  • No items yet
midpage
Baugh v. Hudson
54 Okla. 269
Okla.
1915
Check Treatment

The judgment in this case is a final judgment, because it dismisses the action, and there is *Page 271 no motion for a new trial; nor is there any certificate of the clerk which will enable us to review the record as a transcript. There is therefore nothing before this court.Stanard v. Sampson, 23 Okla. 13, 99 P. 796; Boyd v. Bryan,11 Okla. 56, 65 P. 940; Bradford v. Brennan, 15 Okla. 47,78 P. 387; Ahren-Ott Mfg. Co. v. Condon, 23 Okla. 365,100 P. 556.

As there is no certificate of the clerk authenticating this as a transcript, this court is without jurisdiction to consider any errors which might appear on the face of the record.

We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Case Details

Case Name: Baugh v. Hudson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Nov 16, 1915
Citation: 54 Okla. 269
Docket Number: 5262
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.