11 Mo. App. 114 | Mo. Ct. App. | 1881
delivered the opinion of the court.
It has always been the law in this state, with reference to appeals from justices of the peace to the circuit court, that, unless the appeal is taken within the time prescribed by the statute, the circuit court acquires no jurisdiction to try the cause de novo, but that it is the duty of the circuit court to dismiss the appeal. James v. Robinson, 1 Mo. 594; Holt v. Varner, 5 Mo. 386; Cason v. Tate, 8 Mo. 45; Bernicker v. Miller, 37 Mo. 498; Robinson v. Walker, 45 Mo. 117; Patchin v. Bonsack, 52 Mo. 431; Moore v. Minkler, 3 Mo. App. 596; Union Savings Assn. v. Keiser, 3 Mo. App. 232. In ordinary cases the time allowed for the taking of an appeal is ten days from the rendition of the judgment (Rev. Stats., sect. 3040), or, where the judgment is a judgment by default, or of non-suit, ten days from the refusal of the justice
“When the judgment of the justice is rendered during the vacation of the circuit coui’t, the appeal shall be returnable to the first day of the next term thereof; but if the judgment be rendered during the term of such court, the appeal shall be returnable within six days after the rendition of the judgment.
‘ ‘ The appellant shall cause to be filed in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, such certified transcript of the record and proceedings before the justice, together with the original affidavit, recognizance, and other original papers in the cause, on or before the return-day of the appeal.” Rev. Stats., sects. 2469, 2470, 2481. In cases covered by this statute, it is the duty of the party appealing, and not of the justice, to produce and file the papers in the circuit court; and, where this is not done within the time thus prescribed, it is the duty of the court to dismiss the appeal. Rev. Stats., sect. 2487; Bernicker v. Miller, 37 Mo. 498. And this duty is imperative ; the voluntary appearance and consent of the parties will not give the circuit court jurisdiction to try the cause de novo. Robinson v. Walker, 45 Mo. 117.
This was an action of forcible entry and detainer. The judgment of the justice, which was in favor of the plaintiff, was rendered on September 28, 1880, and the appeal was not taken until the 7th of October following. The circuit court was in vacation at the time, and did not con