History
  • No items yet
midpage
Battle v. State
1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 326
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1926
|
Check Treatment

The judgment omits a description of the offense except by reference to the indictment. While it is better form to do so, it is not necessary that the judgment in a criminal case specify distinctly the offense of which defendant has been convicted, if the other parts of the record are clear in this respect. Demolli v. United States, 144 F. 363, 75 C.C.A. 365, 6 L.R.A. (N.S.) 424, 7 Ann. Cas. 121.

Questions raised on the admission of evidence have been examined by us. The rulings of the court on these questions were either without error, or, if error, were not prejudicial to defendant's rights.

The evidence adduced was sufficient to present a jury question.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Battle v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 9, 1926
Citation: 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 326
Docket Number: 2 Div. 369.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.