Batten v. Ford

3 N.J.L. 455 | N.J. | 1808

It was objected, first, that this state of demand was too uncertain, hut the Court thought that this was a sufficient statement of a contract of sale; it was then contended, that this was a contract for the sale of land, and therefore ought to be in writing, according to the statute; but th© Court over-ruled the objection, and Affirmed the judgment