Edgar Gerold BATIE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 72060.
Supreme Court of Florida.
December 1, 1988.
534 So. 2d 694
McDONALD, Justice.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender and David A. Davis, Asst. Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.
McDONALD, Justice.
We accepted jurisdiction in this cause because of conflict with Nussdorf v. State, 495 So.2d 819 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), review denied, 503 So.2d 328 (Fla. 1987).
Batie, having been convicted of sexual battery upon a person less than twelve years old by a person eighteen years or older, contrary to
A capital felony is one that is punishable by death. Rusaw v. State, 451 So.2d 469 (Fla. 1984). Sexual battery is not punishable by death. Buford. Further, we held in Rowe v. State, 417 So.2d 981 (Fla. 1982), that murder in the first-degree is the only existing capital felony in Florida... . . Sexual battery is not a capital offense, and, therefore, it may be charged by information. See also State v. Hogan, 451 So.2d 844 (Fla. 1984) (sexual battery is not punishable by death, and therefore, it may be tried by a six-member jury).
Notwithstanding our determination that the sexual battery proscribed by
It is so ordered.
EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
BARKETT, J., dissents with an opinion.
BARKETT, Justice, dissenting.
I believe that Buford v. State, 403 So.2d 943 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1163, 102 S.Ct. 1037, 71 L.Ed.2d 319 (1982), and Reino v. State, 352 So.2d 853 (Fla. 1977), require the quashing of the opinion of the district court. In Reino, this Court stated:
[I]t is apparent that all incidents of capital crimes, substantive as well as procedural, become inapplicable upon abolition of the death penalty. It would be conceptually inconsistent to conclude that the procedural advantages inuring to a defendant in a capital case fall with abolition of the death penalty and then conclude that the substantive disadvantages (limitation on entitlement to bail and unlimited statute of limitations) remain viable.
Id. at 858 (emphasis added).
