History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bates v. Visher
2 Cal. 355
Cal.
1852
Check Treatment

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Heydeneeldt, Justice.

The error relied on to reverse this judgment, is, that the trial was by referees, and not by a jury, and that the reference was not authorized. On looking into the record, it appears that there is an entry upon the minutes, which recites that “ the parties came by their attorneys, and defendant by his attorney, moved the Court, that the cause be referred,” &c. Thus the reference was made on the appellant’s motion, and in one of the modes pointed out by law “ by oral consent in . open Court entered on the minutes.”

It is only necessary to state thus much to show that the ob*358jection is entirely unsupported. Indeed the case must be treated as a delay case, and the judgment affirmed with ten per cent, damages and costs.

Anderson, Justice, concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Bates v. Visher
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1852
Citation: 2 Cal. 355
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.