History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bates v. State
133 So. 914
Ala.
1931
Check Treatment

The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree and given the death penalty.

We think that the trial court did not err in holding that a sufficient predicate was laid for the introduction of the confession of the defendant.

The brief of counsel for the appellant criticizes certain portions of the oral charge of the trial court, but we find no objection or exception thereto.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Bates v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Apr 2, 1931
Citation: 133 So. 914
Docket Number: 2 Div. 977.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.