141 F.2d 723 | D.C. Cir. | 1944
Appellee Dorothy N. Bates filed a complaint for maintenance against her husband, appellant Harrison Bates. She charged that his cruelty had compelled her to leave him and that he had refused to support her. She asked for maintenance pendente lite. She did not ask for divorce, either absolute or limited. The court, upon the pleadings and depositions, ordered appellant to pay $500 forthwith, $150 a month pendente lite, and $308.80 suit money. He failed to do so and was committed for contempt. He siied out a writ of habeas
The District Code authorizes suits for maintenance.
However, the District Code provides that where a decree directs only the payment of money, “no defendant shall be imprisoned except in those cases especially provided for.”
“The argument that the appeal [in the habeas corpus case] should not be entertained, because the appellant has been released on bail, and therefore; as is claimed, is not now restrained of his liberty, is plainly unsound. The appellant may not be in prison; but he is in the custody of the law, and is most unquestionably restrained of his liberty.”
Appellee Dorothy N. Bates will be allowed counsel fees of $250 on these appeals.
Nos. 8579, 8580, affirmed;
Nos. 8581, 8604, reversed.
D.C.Code, 1940, § 16—415.
Lesh v. Lesh, 21 App.D.C. 475; Pedersen v. Pedersen, 71 App.D.C. 26, 107 F.2d 227; Howard v. Howard, 72 App.D.C. 145, 112 F.2d 44; Reed v. Reed, 52 App.D.C. 35, 280 F. 1009.
Local Rule 16(a) of the District Court, which provides that “Allowance by the court of compensation to an attorney, fiduciary or guardian ad litem shall be made only on written motion supported by a statement detailing with particularity the nature and extent of services rendered, the time devoted thereto,” etc., does not appear applicable to an award to a wife, pending a maintenance suit, “on account of counsel fees to enable her to conduct her ease.”
D.C.Code 1940, § 11-326.
Rapeer v. Colpoys, 66 App.D.C. 216, 219, 85 F.2d 715.
D.C.Code 1940, §§ 16-415, 16-411, 16-410.
D.C.Code 1940, § 16—410.
D.C.Code 1940, § 11—327.
Costello v. Palmer, 20 App.D.C. 210, 218.