—In an action to recover damages for
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants seeking to recover damages for personal injuries. After the defendants failed to timely answer or appear, a judgment was entered against them. The defendants thereafter moved to vacate the judgment, arguing, inter alia, that they had both a reasonable excuse for their default and a meritorious defense to the action (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]). They further argued that the plaintiffs motion to be granted a judgment upon their default was not supported by an affidavit of the facts or a complaint verified by a party with personal knowledge of the facts, as required by CPLR 3215 (f) (see, Grainger v Wright,
Contrary to the defendants’ contention, they failed to offer a reasonable excuse for their default. Thus, the court properly denied their motion to vacate pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) (see, Booth v Hawk Contrs.,
The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., H. Miller, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.
