117 Ga. App. 89 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1968
The defendant was tried and convicted of violating the State Alcoholic Control Act by reason of his having and possessing nontax-paid whiskey. His motion for
Assuming, without deciding, that the overruling of the motion to suppress was error, it would be necessary to examine and consider the remainder of the transcript of evidence and proceedings in order to determine that this evidence was actually introduced before the jury, and unless it was introduced before the jury, the overruling of the motion to suppress the evidence was harmless, even if error. Under these circumstances the case must be affirmed. Cook v. State, 116 Ga. App. 304, 305 (157 SE2d 160).
Judgment affirmed.