Barwick v. American Manufacturing Co.

30 Ga. App. 761 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1923

Stephens, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

The writer concurs specially in the judgment of affirmance upon the additional ground that under the terms of the alleged contract the so-called sales agent is under no obligation to perform, and that therefore the alleged contract is lacking in mutuality and therefore void and unenforceable.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenlcins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.