144 P. 1146 | Or. | 1914
delivered the opinion of the court.
Where, however, no valuable or lasting improvements have been made by an abutting owner upon a
The character of the buildings in the case at bar is not disclosed. It is believed, however, that they are not of sufficient value nor of such durability as would unmistakably indicate an intention permanently to claim the premises. The court therefore properly concluded that the possession was sufficient as against a private party, but not adequate as against a municipal corporation. It follows that the decree should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Affirmed.