Barse v. Whaley

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed upon authority of Farrell v. Forest Inv. Co., 73 Fla. 191, 74 So.2d Rep. 216; Davidson v. Collier, 75 Fla. 783, 78 So.2d Rep. 983; Smith v. O'Brien, 75 Fla. 252, 78 So.2d Rep. 13; Travis v. Travis, 81 Fla. 309, 87 So.2d Rep. 762; Simpson v. First Nat. Bank of Pensacola, 74 Fla. 539, 77 So.2d Rep. 204; Burgess v. Wirt, 91 Fla. 425, 108 So.2d Rep. 169.

Affirmed.

ELLIS, C. J., AND STRUM AND BROWN, J. J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Barse v. Whaley

Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida

Date Published: Jul 19, 1927

Citation: 114 So. 319

Court Abbreviation: Fla.