Barry v. Ruskin

Jan 31, 1927
Versions:135 A. 914
15 Stock. 557
100 N.J. Eq. 557
1927 N.J. LEXIS 657
Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the conrt below by Vice-Chancellor Berry.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenci-iard, Min-turn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.