midpage

Barrett v. MorgenthauBarrett v. Morgenthau

New York Court of Appeals
Nov 16, 1989
Versions:74 N.Y.2d 907
548 N.E.2d 1300
549 N.Y.S.2d 649
1989 N.Y. LEXIS 3180

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner commenced this article 78 proceeding to compel production of certain documents after his Freedom of Information Law request, initially directed to the District Attorney, was denied in a letter signed by the District Attorney’s records access officer. Inasmuch as the District Attorney failed to advise petitioner of the availability of an administrative appeal in the office (see, 21 NYCRR 1401.7 [b]) and failed to demonstrate in this proceeding that procedures for such an appeal had, in fact, even been established (see, Public Officers Law § 87 [1] [b]), he cannot be heard to complain that petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Barrett v. Morgenthau
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 16, 1989
Citations: 74 N.Y.2d 907; 548 N.E.2d 1300; 549 N.Y.S.2d 649; 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 3180
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In