Barr v. State
2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 88
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2000|
Check TreatmentORDER
Timothy Barr (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).