History
  • No items yet
midpage
Barr v. Hill
1 Add. 276
Pennsylvania Court of Common P...
1795
Check Treatment
President.

The contract is valid, the consideration good, and the conduct of the defendant faithless and immoral. You will consider his declarations as explanatory of his contract made with Barr. Damages ought to be such as may compel a specific execution of the agreement.

Verdict for the plaintiff, 150l.

Case Details

Case Name: Barr v. Hill
Court Name: Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County
Date Published: Sep 15, 1795
Citation: 1 Add. 276
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.