History
  • No items yet
midpage
Baroo v. Hults
192 N.Y.S.2d 482
N.Y. App. Div.
1959
Check Treatment

Determination of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles is annulled, without costs, on the law and on the facts, and the matter remanded for a new hearing. The hearing was inadequate, and the basis for the determination is not sufficiently supported by the record. Moreover, the comments by the trial deputy during the course of the hearing leave the impression of some measure of prejudgment. On the new hearing it would be appropriate to develop the facts more fully as to the condition of the petitioner at the time of the accident, as well as those concerning the surrounding circumstances. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and McNally, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Baroo v. Hults
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 20, 1959
Citation: 192 N.Y.S.2d 482
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.