History
  • No items yet
midpage
Barnum v. Burlingame
154 A.D. 897
N.Y. App. Div.
1912
Check Treatment
Jenks, P. J.:

The court could not secure payment to the respondent for his legal services by the application of any remedy that depends upon the relation of attorney and client, inasmuch as the attorney terminated that relation without sufficient cause. (Matter of H-, 93 N. Y. 381; Matter of Dunn, 205 id. 398.) Such termination worked relegation to ordinary remedie:’- The order is modified by striking out the provision for payment by the client, and as thus modified it is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Thomas, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred. Order modified by striking out the provision for payment by the client, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Case Details

Case Name: Barnum v. Burlingame
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1912
Citation: 154 A.D. 897
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.