History
  • No items yet
midpage
Barnett v. Bacardi
394 So. 2d 1108
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1981
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The trial court granted a temporary injunction but did not require the posting of a bond [there was no attempt to come within the exception to this rule. See: Santona-Nervia Corporation v. Publix Market, Inc., 146 So.2d 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); Hoffman v. White, 235 So.2d 43 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.610(b).] Upon a motion to dissolve, the trial court refused to dissolve the temporary injunction. This appeal ensued. We reverse.

Except in limited circumstances, which are not present in this case, a temporary injunction may not be issued without the posting of a bond. La Gran Familia, Inc. v. Cuba Pharmacy, Inc., 349 So.2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Crow, Pope & Carter, Inc. v. James, 349 So.2d 827 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Therefore, the order refusing to dissolve the temporary injunction be and the same is hereby reversed and the matter remanded to the trial court with directions to grant the motion to dissolve and terminate the temporary injunction.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Case Details

Case Name: Barnett v. Bacardi
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 10, 1981
Citation: 394 So. 2d 1108
Docket Number: No. 80-2384
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.