History
  • No items yet
midpage
Barnes v. Lapham
28 Vt. 307
Vt.
1856
Check Treatment

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bennett, J.

We do not see how the plaintiff can get along with his case. The confession of judgment operated as a merger of his original cause of action, which was made the ground of this suit; and the agreement of the parties at the time, that this suit should go on for the purpose of charging the trustees, and perfecting a judgment against them, cannot arrest the merger and neither can the defendants be estopped from using the merger as a defense to the original cause of action.

The statute passed last fall cannot reach this case. This judgment-was rendered at the March Term of the county court, 1855; and the exceptions pending, at the time of the passage of the act, were but in the nature'of a writ of error, to reverse that judgment.

Judgment affirmed with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Barnes v. Lapham
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Feb 15, 1856
Citation: 28 Vt. 307
Court Abbreviation: Vt.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.