History
  • No items yet
midpage
53 A.D.3d 466
N.Y. App. Div.
2008

BARNES COY ARCHITECTS, P.C., Appellant, v DAVID SHAMOON et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

863 NYS2d 216

■ BARNES COY ARCHITECTS, P.C., Appellant, v DAVID SHAMOON et al., Respondents. [863 NYS2d 216]—

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), dated January 25, 2008, as denied that branch of its motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) for leave to amend the complaint to assert additional allegations and increase the ad damnum clause with respect to the cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, that branch of the plaintiff‘s motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) for leave to amend the complaint to assert additional allegations and increase the ad damnum clause with respect to the cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract is granted, and the amended complaint attached to the motion papers is deemed served.

In the original complaint, the plaintiff asserted, inter alia, a cause of action to recover damages for breach of an “Architect Agreement.” Thereafter, the plaintiff moved, among other things, pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) for leave to amend the complaint to assert additional allegations and increase the ad damnum clause with respect to that cause of action. Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiff‘s motion, as the proposed amendment was neither palpably insufficient nor patently devoid of merit, and there was no evidence that it would prejudice or surprise the defendants (see CPLR 3025 [b]; Lynch v Lynch, 47 AD3d 771, 772 [2008]; see also Bennett v Long Is. Jewish Med. Ctr., 51 AD3d 959 [2008]; Lucido v Mancuso, 49 AD3d 220 [2008], lv granted 2008 NY Slip Op 68750[U] [2d Dept 2008]). Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Lifson and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Barnes Coy Architects, P.C. v. Shamoon
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 1, 2008
Citations: 53 A.D.3d 466; 863 N.Y.S.2d 216
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In