History
  • No items yet
midpage
Barksdale v. State
122 S.E. 96
Ga. Ct. App.
1924
Check Treatment
Broyles, C. J.

The accused was convicted of manufacturing whisky, and his motion for a new trial was based upon the usual general grounds only. There was some evidence authorizing the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloochoorth, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Barksdale v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 6, 1924
Citation: 122 S.E. 96
Docket Number: 15250
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.