History
  • No items yet
midpage
Barker v. Moodie
92 Kan. 566
Kan.
1914
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The rule is well established that when no demurrer has been filed to. a pleading, and it is attacked for the first time by an objection to the introduction of evidence, it must be liberally construed, and any cause of action fairly indicated may be proved although neither fully nor formally expressed. Applying this rule, the answer fairly presented the claim that the consideration for the dissolution settlement by the parties was apportioned, $500 in cash being given for the physical assets, and the note for $500 being given for the plaintiff’s agreement not to engage in business. Consistently with this theory, counsel for the defendant, in his opening statement, said that the whole consideration for the note sued on was the plaintiff’s agreement not to engage in business. The plaintiff should have been allowed to offer evidence to support this theory.

The judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause is remanded with direction to proceed as indicated.

Case Details

Case Name: Barker v. Moodie
Court Name: Supreme Court of Kansas
Date Published: Jun 6, 1914
Citation: 92 Kan. 566
Docket Number: No. 18,858
Court Abbreviation: Kan.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.