History
  • No items yet
midpage
Barker v. City of Pittsburgh
4 Pa. 49
Pa.
1846
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

That there is no contract, express or implied, for the permanence of a salary, is shown by the constitutional provision for the permanence of the salaries of the governor and judges, as exceptions. That there is a strong moral obligation, independent of constitutional provisions, is not to be disputed; but a moral obligation, however sacred, is not a ground for the enforcement of it as a legal right, with which alone we have power to deal. *52The point, however, was decided in the Commonwealth v. Bacon, 6 Serg. & Rawle, 322, which is conclusive as a precedent; and the plaintiff is without remedy for what is certainly a hardship.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Barker v. City of Pittsburgh
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Sep 21, 1846
Citation: 4 Pa. 49
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In