Case Information
*1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON BARK, OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES )
COUNCIL, MAZAMAS, THE FRIENDS OF MT. )
HOOD, OREGON WILDLIFE FEDERAL, )
FRIENDS OF TILLY JANE, and HOOD RIVER )
VALLEY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE, )
)
Plaintiffs, ) ) Civil No. 02-904-HU v. ) ) O R D E R GARY LARSEN, in his official capacity as the )
Forest Supervisor for the Mt. Hood National )
Forest, KIM TITUS, in her official capacity as the )
District Ranger for the Mt. Hood River Ranger )
District of the Mt. Hood National Forest, and the )
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency )
of the United States Department of Agriculture, )
)
Defendants. ) )
Ralph Bloemers
Christopher Winter
CASCADE RESOURCES ADVOCACY GROUP
917 S. W. Oak Street, Suite 417
Gregory J. Dyson
BARK
P. O. Box 12065
Portland, Oregon 97202
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Karin J. Immergut
United States Attorney
District of Oregon
Stephen J. Odell
Assistant United States Attorney
U. S. Attorney's Office
1000 S. W. Third Avenue, Suite 600
Portland, Oregon 97204-2902
Owen L. Schmidt
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of General Counsel, U. S. Department of Agriculture 1734 Federal Building
1220 S. W. Third Avenue
Attorneys for Defendants
KING, Judge:
The Honorable Dennis J. Hubel, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on February 9, 2006. Plaintiffs filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation. When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). The matter is before this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
This court has, therefore, given de novo review of the rulings of Magistrate Judge Hubel. This court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hubel dated February 9, 2006 in its entirety.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Fees (#87) is denied.
DATED this 17 th day of March, 2006.
/s/ Garr M. King GARR M. KING United States District Judge