Barefoot v. Barefoot

83 N.J. Eq. 685 | N.J. | 1914

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the -opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance — The- Ci-iiee-Justioe, Garrison, Swayze, Trenoiiard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscii, Black, Bogert, Vrbdenburgh, Terhune, I-Teprenheimer, Williams — 14.

For reversal — Hone.

midpage