History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bardsley v. Smith
232 A.D. 730
N.Y. App. Div.
1931
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Without adopting the specific views expressed by the learned trial justice at the close of the evidence and which were made the basis of the court’s dismissal of the complaint, we are of opinion that the judgment is proper and the decision on which it is based has ample support in the evidence. The findings of no reliance upon the alleged fraud, of waiver, and of failure to prove damages, are amply supported. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Sherman, JJ. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Bardsley v. Smith
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 15, 1931
Citation: 232 A.D. 730
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.