Barber v. StateBarber v. State
Norman Lorenzo Barber filed a motion for post conviction relief seeking credit for time served prior to conviction. The lower court denied the request without prejudice and this appeal followed.
The sentencing order in circuit court case no. 92-19156 indicates that the defendant was awarded 121 days credit for time served. The sentencing order in circuit court case no. 92-14144 reflects that the defendant has been awarded 58 days credit for time served. Both sentencing orders are correct. See Stevens v. State, 651 So.2d 1298 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Since the trial court had already correctly calculated the credit for time served and made correct awards on the sentencing orders in the two cases, no further judicial action was needed by the trial court. Accordingly there was no error in the trial court‘s denial of the motion for credit for jail time without prejudice.
Defendant asserts, however, that the Department of Corrections has acted inconsistently with the sentencing order and only granted 58 days credit in both cases.1 Our affirmance is without prejudice to defendant to seek relief through the Inmate Grievance Procedure,
Affirmed.