History
  • No items yet
midpage
83 N.Y.S. 1102
N.Y. App. Div.
1903
INGRAHAM, J.

There is presented upon this appeal the same question that was presented in the case of William G. Rose v. Seth Low, as Mayor, et al. (decided herewith) 83 N. Y. Supp. 598; and for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case the order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. City of New York
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 7, 1903
Citation: 83 N.Y.S. 1102
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. City of New York, 83 N.Y.S. 1102