21677 | S.C. | Mar 22, 1982

Per Curiam:

Plaintiff-appellant, claiming to be the father, brought this action to establish parental rights to an illegitimate child. His complaint was dismissed as stating no cause of action entitling him to relief; and he has appealed on the following sole exception:

The lower court erred in finding for the respondent upon the respondent’s motion to dismiss.

The foregoing exception fails to comply with Supreme Court Rule 4(6), Williams v. Regula, 266 S. C. 228, 222 S.E.2d 7" date_filed="1976-02-03" court="S.C." case_name="Williams Ex Rel. Estate of Williams v. Regula">222 S. E. (2d) 7, and is so deficient as to present no issue for review. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.