History
  • No items yet
midpage
Barbara Curry v. Nancy Berryhill
680 F. App'x 248
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barbara Lindsey Curry, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Drum, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

Barbara Lindsey Curry appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and affirming the Social Security Administration’s decision to deny Curry disability benefits. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Curry’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Curry has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Barbara Curry v. Nancy Berryhill
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 16, 2017
Citation: 680 F. App'x 248
Docket Number: 16-1627
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.