Barbagallo v. Nationwise Exterminating & Deodorizing, Inc.Barbagallo v. Nationwise Exterminating & Deodorizing, Inc.
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., caused by the appellant’s alleged negligent use of pesticides, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered March 18, 1998, which denied its motion, inter alia, for leave to vacate a judg
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
A motion for leave to vacate a judgment entered upon a default may be granted if the movant establishes that its default was excusable and that it has a meritorious defense to the action (see, Grutman v Southgate at Bar Harbor Home Owners’ Assn.,
By letter dated January 15, 1996, sent to the Dobbs Ferry address, the insurance carrier for Nationwise notified Nation-wise that it was no longer providing coverage. As a result of this disclaimer of coverage, by letter dated March 28, 1996, which was also sent to the Dobbs Ferry address, the law firm representing Nationwise notified Nationwise that it was withdrawing from the case. By order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered August 13, 1996, the law firm was discharged as attorney of record for Nationwise, and Nationwise was directed to appear by new counsel no later than September 30, 1996, and to appear at a preliminary conference on October 30, 1996. This order was sent to the Dobbs Ferry address. However, Nationwise did not appear for this conference and the plaintiffs moved for leave to enter a judgment. Under these circumstances, Nationwise cannot claim that its default was excusable on the theory that it failed to receive notice or mistakenly believed that it continued to be represented by counsel. Instead, Nationwise knew of the lawsuit, yet never provided its attorneys, insurance carrier, the Secretary of State, or the court with any other address at which Nationwise or its agents could receive mail.
Since Nationwise did not adequately establish a reasonable excuse for its default and a meritorious defense to the action, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the motion to vacate the judgment.
The remaining contentions of Nationwise lack merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.