41 N.Y.S. 976 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1896
There is no question as to the power of the court to vacate any of its judgments upon a proper state of facts. The question before us is whether the order of the court below vacating the entry of this judgment was proper under the circumstances here disclosed. Rule 19 of the General Rules of Practice provides that every judgment exceeding two folios in length shall be distinctly numbered and marked at each folio in the margin thereof; and the entry of the judgment in this case by the Special Term was a violation of
We think, therefore, that to grant this motion would be an express violation of the provisions of the Code and an exercise of a power unauthorized by law.
The order ajipealed from should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion below denied, with ten dollars costs.
Van Brunt, P. J., Rumsey, Williams and Patterson, JJ., concurred.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.