History
  • No items yet
midpage
Banks v. Lewis
4 Ala. 599
Ala.
1843
Check Treatment
ORMOND, J.

The plea in this case cannot be sustained. The authorities cited show that a plea containing matter in abatement and concluding in bar, is bad, as a plea in abatement. The conclusion of a plea in abatement is a prayer that the writ be quashed — the denial that the plaintiff can maintain his action is an admission that the writ is properly sued out.

It was also necessary that the affidavit should have been set out on oyer, that the Court might have been able to judge whether the affidavit was defective or not. [Findley v. Pruitt, 9 Porter, 195.]

Let the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Banks v. Lewis
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jan 15, 1843
Citation: 4 Ala. 599
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.