Banks Law Pub. Co. v. Lawyers' Co-operative Pub. Co.
169 F. 386
2d Cir.1909Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.
It is not necessary to discuss so much of the opinion below as deals with the questions of assignment and of the right of the official reporter to secure copyrights. We concur with Judge Hazel in his reasoning and conclusion that the arrangement of reported cases in sequence, their paging and distribution into volumes, are not features of such importance as to entitle the reporter to copyright protection of such details.
The decree is affirmed, with costs.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
