Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,616, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6659, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,413 in Re Jong Gil Kim Jung W. Kim, Debtors. Cho Hung Bank, a Korean Corporation v. Jong Gil Kim Jung W. Kim, AKA Jung Wha Kim AKA Jung W. Cho Kim Dba Gill & Company
62 F.3d 1511
9th Cir.
1995
Check Treatment

62 F.3d 1511

Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,616, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6659,
95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,413
In re Jong Gil KIM; Jung W. Kim, Debtors.
CHO HUNG BANK, a Korean corporation, Appellee,
v.
Jong Gil KIM; Jung W. Kim, aka Jung Wha Kim aka Jung W. Cho
Kim dba Gill & Company, Appellants.

No. 94-55308.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 11, 1995*.
Decided Aug. 23, 1995.

David Zweig, Los Angeles, CA, for appellants.

Henry Gweon, Law Offices of Jang W. Lee, Los Angeles, CA, for appellee.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel MEYERS, OLLASON, and PERRIS, Judges, Presiding.

Before: THOMPSON, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel held that fraudulently inducing a creditor's extension of the due date for repayment of a loan was sufficient under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 523(a)(2) to support a claim of nondischargeability against a debtor in bankruptcy, and it was not necessary for the creditor to show that "new money" was lent to the debtor. We agree. The opinion of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in In re Kim, 163 B.R. 157 (9th Cir. BAP 1994) is hereby adopted as the opinion of this Court.

2

AFFIRMED.

Notes

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs and without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4