Case Information
*1 Case 2:15-cv-01213-APG-NJK Document 5 Filed 08/10/15 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
STEVEN J. BANK, )
) ) Plaintiff(s), 2:15-cv-01213-APG-NJK ) )
vs. REPORT AND
) ) RECOMMENDATION LAS VEGAS JUSTICE COURT, et al.,
) )
Defendant(s).
)
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s Order (Docket No. 3). Plaintiff filed an incomplete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on June 25, 2015. Docket No. 1. As a result, the Court could not determine whether Plaintiff qualified to proceed in forma pauperis . On July 2, 2015, the Court entered an Order denying Plaintiff’s Application without prejudice, directing the Clerk of Court to mail Plaintiff a new application, and allowing Plaintiff to file a completed application or pay the $400 filing fee no later than August 3, 2015. See Docket No. 3. The Order advised Plaintiff that failure to timely comply could result in a dismissal of the action. Plaintiff has not complied or requested an extension of time in which to comply.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . . *2 Case 2:15-cv-01213-APG-NJK Document 5 Filed 08/10/15 Page 2 of 2 Accordingly,
IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff’s ability to commence a new action in which he either pays the appropriate filing fee in full or submits a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis .
IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment accordingly.
NOTICE
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court. Pursuant to Local Rule of Practice (LR) IB 3-2(a), any party wishing to object to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge shall file and serve specific written objections together with points and authorities in support of those objections, within fourteen days of the date of service of the findings and recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s Order. Martinez v. Ylst , 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). The points and authorities filed in support of the specific written objections are subject to the page limitations found in LR 7-4.
Dated: August 10, 2015
________________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge
- 2 -