History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bank v. . Clark
8 N.C. 36
N.C.
1820
Check Treatment

The acceptance and payment of a check is prima facie evidence that the plaintiffs had in deposit money of the defendants wherewith to pay it; and if the fact were not so it is incumbent upon the plaintiffs to prove by the (37) state of the accounts that the defendants have overdrawn. But that cannot be shown by the books of the bank, which is only a private corporation, and they are inadmissible in favor of the plaintiffs. The judgment below is

Affirmed.

Cited: Fox v. Horah, 36 N.C. 360; Bland v. Warren, 65 N.C. 374;Durham v. R. R., 108 N.C. 402; Dyeing v. Hosiery Co., 126 N.C. 294.

Case Details

Case Name: Bank v. . Clark
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 5, 1820
Citation: 8 N.C. 36
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.