midpage

Bank One, Corp. v. BornscheinBank One, Corp. v. Bornschein

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Jul 16, 2008
No. 4D07-2536
Versions:987 So. 2d 172
2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 10853
2008 WL 2744370
PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion for attorney’s fees based upon both an offer of settlement and section 57.105, Florida Statutes. While the order does not make any findings of fact as to whether the offer qualified or was made in good faith, such findings are not required under the offer of judgment statute. Evans v. Piotraczk, 724 So.2d 1210, 1213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). There is no transcript of the hearing where the court denied the motion, and we cannot determine whether the trial court’s ruling was an abuse of its discretion. Without this we must affirm. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150,1152 (Fla.1979).

WARNER, MAY, JJ., and BIDWILL, MARTIN J., Associate Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Bank One, Corp. v. Bornschein
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 16, 2008
Citations: 987 So. 2d 172; 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 10853; 2008 WL 2744370; No. 4D07-2536
Docket Number: No. 4D07-2536
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In