History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bank One, Corp. v. Bornschein
987 So. 2d 172
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2008
|
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion for attorney’s fees based upon both an offer of settlement and section 57.105, Florida Statutes. While the order does not make any findings of fact as to whether the offer qualified or was made in good faith, such findings are not required under the offer of judgment statute. Evans v. Piotraczk, 724 So.2d 1210, 1213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). There is no transcript of the hearing where the court denied the motion, and we cannot determine whether the trial court’s ruling was an abuse of its discretion. Without this we must affirm. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150,1152 (Fla.1979).

WARNER, MAY, JJ., and BIDWILL, MARTIN J., Associate Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Bank One, Corp. v. Bornschein
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 16, 2008
Citation: 987 So. 2d 172
Docket Number: No. 4D07-2536
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.