3 Binn. 338 | Pa. | 1811
delivered the court’s opinion.
The first exception in this case,' is founded in matter of fact. The arbitrators have been examined, and it appears that this exception has not been supported.
In the second exception two points of law are involved. fohn W. Swift had claims in two distinct rights: one as surviving partner of George Plumstead-, the other by virtue of
Award confirmed.
A doubt having been afterwards expressed by the defendant’s counsel, whether the amount of Swift’s claim against the partnership was equal to the sum awarded, the court recommitted the report to the same referees to ascertain the amount of Swift’s lien on the partnership stock, and directed judgment to be entered for it in vacation upon the return of the award.