Balsam v. State

May 20, 1915
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Thomas
THOMAS, J.

Tbe judgment in this case is affirmed ‍​​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‍on tbe authority of Mangeldorf v. State, 8 Ala. App. 302, 62 South. 373, Ex parte Mangeldorf, 185 Ala. 33, 64 South. 598, and State ‍​​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‍v. Parker, 5 Ala. App. 231, 59 South. 741, which settle, adversely to appellant, every question raised in ‍​​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‍tbe case, except tbe contention that tbe fact of tbe repeal, since defendant’s conviction, of ‍​​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‍tbe act under which defendant was convicted, destroys tbe prosecution. That contention is equally without merit.—Code, ‍​​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‍§ 7806) Birmingham v. Baranco, 4 Ala. App. 279; 58 South. 944.

Affirmed.