History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ballew v. Tew & Ellison
33 S.E. 395
Ga.
1899
Check Treatment
Lewis, J.

The verdict for the defendants in this case being demanded by the evidence, the court committed no error in directing the jury to find in their favor. If there was any error of law committed by the court in the various rulings complained of, such error was immaterial and therefore harmless to the plaintiffs in error.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Complaint. Before Judge Harris. City court of Floyd county. November 15,1897. Henry Walker, for plaintiffs: Rowell & Rowell and McHenry & Nunnally, for, defendants.

Case Details

Case Name: Ballew v. Tew & Ellison
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 22, 1899
Citation: 33 S.E. 395
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.