History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ballentine v. Ballentine
2 Monag. 333
Pa.
1888
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

None of the assignments of error in this case can be sustained. The court committed no error; hence judgment must be sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Ballentine v. Ballentine
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 18, 1888
Citation: 2 Monag. 333
Docket Number: No. 195
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.