History
  • No items yet
midpage
Baldwin v. Kramer
2 Cal. 582
Cal.
1852
Check Treatment
Heydeneeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the Court; with which Murray, Chief Justice, concurred.

This was an appeal from an order granting a new trial. The judgment was rendered in May, and the new trial granted at a subsequent term in September.

We hold, that after the expiration of a term of the District Court, no power remains in it to set aside a judgment, or grant a new trial. A different doctrine would lead to great uncertainty, and pojsibly to gross abuse. There must be a time when the rights of the parties are to be considered as determined, and for litigation to cease; and for this purpose the law has wisely fixed the rule here indicated.

Let the order be reversed with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Baldwin v. Kramer
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1852
Citation: 2 Cal. 582
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.